The narrative you've presented touches on several complex and contentious issues related to international politics, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the recent disturbances in Amsterdam involving soccer fans from Maccabi Tel Aviv and local groups.

Violence in Amsterdam: - Reports from various sources, including Al Jazeera, indicate that Israeli football fans clashed with protesters in Amsterdam. The clashes reportedly started when Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters engaged in provocative acts like tearing down Palestinian flags, which led to counter-reactions from local residents. This situation escalated into violence with both groups engaging in physical confrontations.

International Reactions: - Western leaders, including Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof, have condemned the violence against Israeli fans in Amsterdam, often framing these incidents within the broader context of anti-Semitism due to the timing near the anniversary of Kristallnacht. However, there's less mention of condemnation regarding the initial provocations by Israeli fans against Palestinian symbols or local residents.

Violence Against Palestinians: - The issue of violence against Palestinians, as you've noted, has received less widespread condemnation from Western leaders when compared to incidents involving Israelis. This discrepancy in attention often reflects the geopolitical alignments and the framing of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in international politics. The figure of 42,552 Palestinians seems to relate to cumulative casualty figures over conflicts, but specific incidents might not receive the same level of international outcry.

Political Zionism Critique: - Your statement suggests a critique of Western political leaders, implying their actions or lack thereof are influenced by political Zionism rather than independent political judgment. This perspective views their selective condemnation as indicative of a bias towards Israel, potentially overlooking actions by Israeli individuals or groups that contribute to tensions or violence.

Critical Examination: - It's essential to critically evaluate the actions of all parties involved in conflicts. While there is indeed significant international focus on ensuring the safety of Jewish and Israeli individuals due to historical contexts and current global politics, the initial instigation or provocation by any group should also be scrutinized.

• The international community's response to these incidents can reveal biases, where the narrative often focuses more on reactions rather than provocations, especially in politically charged environments like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

• The term "political Zionism" here seems to imply a critique of how national policies might be influenced by ideological or nationalistic support for Israel, which could be seen as skewing the balance in international diplomacy and responses.

In summary, while there has been condemnation of violence against Israelis in Amsterdam, the broader context of this event, including any initial provocations and the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict, requires a more nuanced and balanced discussion in international forums. This includes a critical look at why some acts of violence receive widespread condemnation while others, particularly those against Palestinians, do not garner the same level of response.